data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0558b/0558b21e808cb473df6dc8b437551918d74458de" alt=""
In image 1 there are bold but fading thicks and thins.
In Image 2 there are densities of marks akin to words but without the spaces.
The work in Image 3 uses a narrower tool and its density is alleviated by loops at intervals enclosing space.
The marks in these three examples are not only dense but complex too. The rhythm is staccato, abruptly disconnected and angular.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9d30/d9d302337790f207c40217ebdea583b6fc99ec98" alt=""
The maker's hand is evident and insistent in all these three pieces, wanting to communicate even though the language is unknown.
After much twisting, turning and flipping over here is a tiny fragment from a piece of Russian Drawn Threadwork which relates most closely to the examples above. It's the reverse side of the piece and I think shows the angularity and staccato rhythm I've described. I'm trying to imagine it stitched en masse.
Alice Fox's piece is also rhythmic, but has a more reflective quality. To me it's about absence, rather than presence, what remains. It links in my mind with the band of printed lines on old envelopes which I talked about in Chapter 1 and resonances of the letter writers.
There are I think associations between this crop of 4:6:12 and Alice Fox's piece. There are repetitions, without each mark being identical. There are also a range of tones, space and lightness which give a sense of the ephemeral.
No comments:
Post a Comment