A second go at the pear. This time with a 5B pencil, much easier to control, though I do recognise the need to work in pen. The shape is more accurate but the soft finger-blended shading hardly shows on the blog.
Labels: Pear

I decided to stay with the graphite stick and the ammonite, using the matching-sized paper to rest it on and marking its outer extremities. I felt more sure-handed this time and applied more pressure. And because I'm more familiar with the object included more detail -- lines and a little shading. On to the pear, using a permanent (a mistake I think as it came through the paper and I was very tempted to tear it out) pen. Moral: know how your equipment works. The outline roughly matches, but the attempt at shading isn't convincing.Labels: Day 3

I'm very attracted to the idea of synchronicity. Take, for example the book "Complications: a surgeon's notes on an imperfect science" by Atul Gerwande, borrowed from my daughter's Nevada bookshelf. Gerwande drew my attention to the fact that potential surgeons are selected for their tenacity rather than their skill, which can be taught. Chiming with this idea is the experience of photographer Dorothy Bohm whose retrospective I visited at the Sainsbury Centre in Norwich. Her father's Leica was thrust into her hands as she made her exodus from Konigsburg in Prussia aged sixteen. It was her determination which made her a photographer not only successful enough to provide for her husband through his years of studying for a chemistry doctorate but throughout her very long career -- she's eighty-five. Some might say it's not synchronicity so much as an extra nudge to get working, though after Urchfont I shouldn't need anything more!
Labels: Synchronicity

Days 1 and 2

Summer Sketchbook Project

If this is a race, I'm in desperate straits as I'm only making a start today. However, I do have a reason -- not an excuse, you understand -- I'm in recovery from our son's wedding in Ireland, a five day affair and very lively.

I've chosen two items to draw, a single hydrangea flower (a wedding relic) and an ammonite. Neither were easy though I felt happier with the ammonite. I used a graphite stick as a measure to try to get the proprtions right, even so I haven't been able to convey any sense of 3D or the lovely crisp dried beauty of the original. The ammonite's form is bolder and maybe that helped. I must admit to taking a photograph of both after the drawing exercise and realised how little, as yet, my eyes are noticing.

I also think the strips of tissue and other papers seem to dominate. Could it be the glue I'm using? Would Pritt be better than PVA?